🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked the legislature to enact a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, support gathered behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. An organization established by the family of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," said a leading peer.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the local level due to federal inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to follow Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from the West, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide conversation continues, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.